After 4 days, the ROYAL FLAG TOURNAMENT will end.
A few days before the tournament, I began to prepare. Moved cities closer to enemies and allies who are willing to help win the tournament.
As of October 1, 8 am on server time, I was in the lead. Victory is near. The second place is occupied by the player, who has less than 15 sets of flags.
I look through cities and a copy of neighbors on flags, and here there is a message:
- 1.png (33.66 KiB) Viewed 9550 times
I know that I did not negotiate with anyone, so someone complained. And once they complained, the battle report and time could be learned only in the tavern. We go into it. The first mention of my account was on the 26th of September at 8:51.
According to the definition of a contractual fight, the battle is for the benefit of both participants. We look at the fight. Is it advantageous for me: I am an apostate, I attack a player without a hero (I do not get experience), I go on a mission with a robbery without nsilshchikov (I do not get resources). You say you got a faction rating? so after all, and I'm going to the player of his own race, the same dark faction as me. At the time of the battle, I was in the status of an apostate, the player to whom the attack was committed - was not and at the moment is not an apostate.
But to whom was this battle all the better? now it becomes clear that the beneficiary is the player who tried to mislead the administration. By issuing the usual capture of the flags by a contractual battle, the player complaining did not bother to prove that the defender is an apostate, that someone from the participating in the battle is advantageous. In turn, the incompetent administrator, not to check on the fact whether the fight was contractual, not checking it for the benefit of even one of the parties - blocked both players.
Either an irresponsible employee works in the administration, who, without checking information, creates arbitrariness that affects the course of the players' tournament table, and in general clans (after all, in order to win the tournament, clans help the 1st player from the clan to collect as many sets of flags as possible). This person substitutes both players and all clans. Either it is advantageous for this administrator to block the best collector, since this administrator has an account in the game and he "enjoys his official position" !!!
We will return to this issue, consider fights. The next day, another battle took place. The player in the second place in the standings attacked also with the mission of robbery.
)
- 6.png (420.78 KiB) Viewed 9549 times
So that's it. In this regard, please consider my complaint on the following positions:
1) Cancel the blocking of my account, and cancel the lock for 1 day (as if the next time there is a similar lie to my address - then my account will be blocked for 3 or more days).
2) Check the administrator who blocked accounts, because of unverified information. Conduct a test of his professional suitability for this position. Check if he has an account in the game, if so - then change the administrator, because a person uses his position to achieve results in the game. If there is no account, check it for corruption.
3) Make a warning to the player who gave knowingly false information about the fight. Up to the temporary blocking of the account. (why temporary? because I want to later punish this player for slander)
4) I ask you to finish the tournament with the indicators in the standings as of October 1st 9 am. Since I was blocked by mistake by the administrators, and the rest of the players had a lot of time to fix the standings. This is not an honest game. Or as of October 2, 9h. 27 minutes to return the values of the day's prescription to all players.
I was slandered by contractual fighting. I have never violated the rules of the game (there is experience of playing on a foreign server). I went to the first place in the tournament, and from the submission of a mean player to an inexperienced (or bribable, or incompetent) administrator, the account was blocked. My fault in this is not. For this error, either the administrator who made the decision or the player who filed the complaint must answer, knowing that the fight is not under the contract. They want to make me guilty: to increment the subsequent locks for an extended time, to deprive me of the artifact that I sought for a week, and expose an unfair player.
